You can save an existing copy of an earlier version of PhotoStitcher somewhere else, & go back to it if you have problems with today's v. PhotoStitcher itself is a 12MB one file app with 2 registry keys, one for uninstall, & one for the program. And sometimes inpainting works better than other methods, sometimes not. Teorex specializes in a kind or method of image analysis & manipulation called inpainting. Save | CancelĪn image is just a collection of pixels or dots, & when you use image editing software it analyzes those pixels & modifies them. Thinking that a bundle of shots taken without thought of panoramic integration can afterwards be pulled together into a satisfyingly accurate image is to believe in a wizardry best left to Tolkien. Thinking that a bundle of shots taken without thought of panoramic integration can afterwards be pulled together into a satisfyingly accurate image is to believe in a wizardry best left to Tolkien.īottom line: if you're looking to create panoramas that are visually satisfying by virtue of their visual integrity, then always but always remember that the creation process starts with the taking of the pictures themselves. Either way, Teorex has come up with a useful tool in the post-processing kit whether or not the re-install price is worth the $ is something only the individual GOTDer can ultimately decide.īottom line: if you're looking to create panoramas that are visually satisfying by virtue of their visual integrity, then always but always remember that the creation process starts with the taking of the pictures themselves. Indeed: if by some small miracle you have finished up with a number of shots which are consistent each with the other in terms of lighting, perspective and focal length, then you may well find this out-performs ICE. That said: I can't see any reason why anyone should not download and try out today's offer so long as she or he doesn't believe everything that's claimed for it in its marketing hype. All I will say is that Microsoft - of whom, as is well known, I am anything but a fan - has never made the claims that Teorex does. This once buoyant software sector was comprehensively undermined by camera manufacturers who incorporated a 'panoramic' shooting feature as standard on even the cheapest cameras, and was then demolished by Microsoft's freeware ICE, which I also highlighted a year ago so won't bother talking about now. (And even if you do go the full Adobe route, and hire in an Art Studio to do the work, you still won't succeed.) So unless you're using $800sworth of Adobe software in the manner I did to deal with the this-way-that-way shadows and skewed verticals and disproportionate image features arising from zoom length variations, then no, you ain't going to manufacture a 'perfect panorama' from a random collection of uni-locational pictures. because no software ever could.Īpart from anything else, you'd need to post-process the output to correct verticals as well as figure out how to resolve disproportionate representation of an image element due to the camera having originally zoomed out, or in. Because if they weren't, then this software won't deliver what is promised. And, despite the developer's blurb, were shot from the same perspective. Need to have been taken under the same lighting conditions and approximate time of day. Until it's appreciated, that those photographs need to have the same focal length. This, however, is promoted as software which "smoothly combines photos of different resolutions, shooting angles and even different perspectives into one perfect panorama." About the only thing I can think an image assembler might do is put together several images as a mosaic. My concerns remain: that the hype for PhotoStitcher 1.6 is more appropriate for an image assembler, as distinct from an image stitcher. This program was offered almost a year ago so I won't reprise the GOTD comment I made then.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |